Jurassic World

Okay, so it's no secret that Jurassic World is well on it's way to breaking a lot of records for big summer block busters.  It's not really that shocking, honestly.  Of the top twenty highest grossing films currently 3/4ths of them are sequels, prequels, or shared universe type films.  In other words, all of us movie goers love familiarity and nostagia.  When we go to a movie and are thoroughly entertained, we want more.  We want to see what happens next, how our favorite characters evolve, and especially how the world we've been immersed in moves forward, usually after some potentially world altering events.  Jurassic Park was such a film, I wanted to know if the Park would ever re-open, how palentology would change, if the technology would ever be used in other ways or for other reasons.  How would the government begin regulating things if they keep getting out of hand?  Would people start thinking the Flinstones was about the future instead of the past as dinosaurs became more and more common?  Okay, maybe not that last one, but I'm sure most of us finished watching Jurassic Park for the first time (or the twentieth time) and wondered.  I feel that's a good thing; no one wants to end a movie without being exposed to at least one thing that's thought provoking enough to keep you at least a little curious.  Sure, there are some late night comedies and explosive action flics that try intentionally to keep you from thinking too hard about anything, but most films should invite wonder and curiosity even after the credits role, and those films, if they created an interesting enough film to keep you thinking about it and wondering the what if's as you walked out of the theater, generally do well with sequels, and some exceptional worlds, like one particular world Spielberg created back in '93, warrent more than a sequel, and become franchises.
Now, there is one huge problem with franchises.  There's this expectation that it has to do everything that the previous films did, but bigger.  I mean, how did one little lightsaber duel in A New Hope become several lightsaber duels, including one with a robot dude with four lightsabers at once in Revenge of the Sith?  How did a couple quarter mile races turn into cars jumpingfrom one sky scraper to another and parachuting out of planes in the Fast and Furious movies?  Dr. No ends with James Bond taking out just a few guys, Skyfall ends with him blowing up buildings and helecopters and countless bad guys.  I don't know about you, but when I'm lookiing forward to a new film in a given franchise, I'm not thinking, "I sure hope there are more explosions and it's even more exciting than the last installment."  I'm usually thinking, "I hope it stays true to what I loved about the franchise so far."  I imagine that's normal.  But there's obviously a few people out there who can only be happy with bigger, louder, more extreme films.  And apparently they just happen to end up in all of Hollywood's focus groups.
Don't get me wrong, I love how visually rewarding some films can be, and for films that depend on visual effects more than story, that's just great.  I'm just always a little disappointed when something that I'd really like to have a great story ends up being just a bunch of big explosions or something like that.  Why does that whole world have to be at stake for a film to be good?  What happened to movies like Jaws where it's just a few guys trying to do the right thing for a small town?  Okay, I think my rant is over, now it's time to actually talk about Jurassic World.
You might expect me to start by saying how the story ws a little weak and it just sold itself out for some bigger dinos and more fatalities.  Sure that's true, but I'm mostly interested in the fact that Jurassic World was belittling the same trend that gave it the biggest opening weekend of all time.  Here are some of the concepts openly discussed in the film.  First, there's the talk about they need a new attraction every once and a while to keep interest (some may argue it was the wait between installments that made Jurassic World such a big hit, but look at most big franchises like the Avengers movies and Fast/Furious), then they talk about they need bigger dinosaurs, especially with more teeth, and that's drilled home by the kid that rattles of how many teeth each predator has, obviously more is better (teeth could be anything, but I'm thinking explosions, body count, car chases, gun fights, and such fall in that category), and finally, they actually talk about how the dinosaurs aren't really dinosaurs, they're just entertainment tools.  What movie in it's right mind goes out of its way to remind its audience that all the monsters are just designed to look scary without regard to actual reality?  And then makes billions off of all those people that just don't care.
I don't know if I find it more ironic or brilliant, but it certainly is a little of both.  Jurassic World tells the audience that it's pandering to them, and doesn't even appologize for it.  The whole series has followed the one uping pattern.  T-Rex was the big guy in the original, but only threatened a few people, but by Lost World, he was running through city streets.  Then JP3 brings in a bigger dinosaur.  World follows right along and gets an even bigger guy, and equips him with bigger brains and a handful of apparent superpowers as well.  Why not.  I've not counted, but I'm pretty confident that it has the highest body count as well.  Everything is bigger there is plenty of excitement throughout.  What more could you ask for?
Critisism for this film mostly centers around a couple key points, lack of scientific accurcy or consistency, poor story line or side stories, and of course, there are always people that complain about one or two scenes that ruined the movie for them.  I feel that all of these arguments are valid.  The story wasn't perfect, and was less than perfectly executed.  There are some plot holes, contradictions, and other issues.  There is at least one scene that I personally think should have gone differently.  No, it's not a perfect film. I am forced to ask though, if this was a stand alone movie, if Jurassic Park had never happened (don't cry, it's just hypothetical), would any of us care?  I think two things are forcing us to look at Jurassic World far more critically than we would otherwise.  One, it's not as good as Jurassic Park, but since very few adventure films in the history of film are as good as Jurassic Park, why should we care that this one isn't. It's the least dissappointing follow up to the original film to date, so why worry that it doesn't meet the highest standard available?  Second, it's made a bunch of money.  We're talking top ten status if it keeps up it's pace.  Do we really want a generic summer blockbuster to sit in the ranks with films like Avatar and Titanic?  Then again, Furious 7's up there as well as a couple of the Transformers sequels, so apparently, that's the way the world is going.  As they would say on Jurassic World, the audience wants more teeth.
Overall, I loved Jurassic World.  I will be purchasing it, and recommend the same to all.  There are some intense scenes, of course, and some language.  Some of the deaths are a little more gruesom/intense than previous films, but if you are comfortable with the series thus far, there should be no surprises regarding content from this one.